xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel

from [Christoph Hellwig] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:13:19 +0100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070808040804.GJ52011508@xxxxxxx>
References: <46B91EBA.10407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808025615.GH52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B9316A.40508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808040804.GJ52011508@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i 
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:08:04PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > yeah, figured it had something to do w/ the ia64 weenies when I saw the
> > 32 vs. 8, factor of 4 ... fine, fine, my bad.  :)
> 
> No, not your bad. Mine if anyones because I wrote the test.

Ia64 supports 4k, 8k, 16k and 64k base pagesize.  Time to add a little
script to make the pagesize random for your kernel builds?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XFS thread inflation in 2.6.23rc, Andi Kleen
Next by Date:  Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS, Martin Steigerwald
Previous by Thread:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, David Chinner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]