xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 23:17:13 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070808131319.GA11451@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46B91EBA.10407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808025615.GH52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B9316A.40508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808040804.GJ52011508@xxxxxxx> <20070808131319.GA11451@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:13:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:08:04PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > yeah, figured it had something to do w/ the ia64 weenies when I saw the
> > > 32 vs. 8, factor of 4 ... fine, fine, my bad.  :)
> > 
> > No, not your bad. Mine if anyones because I wrote the test.
> 
> Ia64 supports 4k, 8k, 16k and 64k base pagesize.  Time to add a little
> script to make the pagesize random for your kernel builds?

Interesting idea. Definitely worth considering for the randomised
mkfs/mount option config QA runs we already do....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>