| To: | "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel |
| From: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:47:29 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>, "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs-oss" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <D59801BCA402F5418C040937230AF7E00B9A8E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx om> |
| References: | <D59801BCA402F5418C040937230AF7E00B9A8E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | SquirrelMail/1.4.8-4.el4.centos |
>> From: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of >> David Chinner >> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 9:56 PM >> To: Eric Sandeen >> Cc: xfs-oss >> Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel > ... >> mmap dirties entire pages. page size differs between platforms - >> ia64 = 16k, x86 = 4k - so the size of the extent allocated is >> different. Guess what platform I wrote the test on and use as my >> primary platform? >> >> The output needs better filtering, methinks. > > Could the test be changed so the output is pagesize independent > rather than filtering the output? Or maybe the test should > use a buffer size that's the LCM of all supported page sizes. > FWIW, xfs-cmds/xfstests/src/feature.c will tell you the page size (-s); with that you can accurately filter the output and not lose any info. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Alex Elder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 968837 - fix nasty quota hashtable allocation bug, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Alex Elder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |