xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel

To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:12 -0500
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <op.twp5etpa3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46B91EBA.10407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808025615.GH52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B9316A.40508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808040804.GJ52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B94259.6060309@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808041920.GK52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B94680.3070405@xxxxxxxxxxx> <op.twp5etpa3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
Barry Naujok wrote:

> Instead of "no flags", how about "00000" so the test doesn't break
> with xfsprogs 2.9.x and later.
> 
> 
[root@inode xfstests]# rpm -q xfsprogs
xfsprogs-2.9.3-1


I have that... but... whatever works :)

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>