xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel

from [David Chinner] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:08:04 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <46B9316A.40508@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46B91EBA.10407@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20070808025615.GH52011508@xxxxxxx> <46B9316A.40508@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i 
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> yeah, figured it had something to do w/ the ia64 weenies when I saw the
> 32 vs. 8, factor of 4 ... fine, fine, my bad.  :)

No, not your bad. Mine if anyones because I wrote the test.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen
Previous by Thread:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:  Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]