| To: | Martin Schröder <martin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:12:05 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <68c491a60708301539t2d386c88n907de44cf1ed743b@mail.gmail.com> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <46D6F066.5000009@op.pl> <20070830165556.GA13308@infradead.org> <68c491a60708301539t2d386c88n907de44cf1ed743b@mail.gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 00:39 +0200, Martin SchrÃder wrote: > > > > > 2007/8/30, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:29:26PM +0200, Bogdan wrote: > > > The header files should not only be > > > ISO-C-compatible, but even ANSI-C-compatible. This will allow > anyone > > > to use them. > > > > Sais who? The GNU C extensions are very useful for programming, and > > there is no reason to move to an inferior dialect. > > Do you want to limit xfs to gcc/Linux? Other Unices may use other ccs. > These headers compile just fine on IRIX, FreeBSD and MacOSX ... the gcc-specific pieces are in platform dependent headers already. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs, Martin Schröder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs, Barry Naujok |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs, Martin Schröder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: About errors in XFS header files and xfsprogs, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |