Re: [PATCH V2] remove unused BULKSTAT_FG_INLINE

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> I was looking at xfs_bulkstat with an eye towards stack reduction,
>> and came across this... doesn't help stack, but it doesn't appear
>> that the BULKSTAT_FG_INLINE bulkstat is ever used... 
>>
>> Is it there for a reason?  If not here's a patch.

Ah hell.  dmapi uses it in cvs... drat, foiled again.  (there's also
some stack savings to be had by removing the private_data bulkstat
field... but dmapi uses that too)

-Eric