| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:13:19 +0100 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20070808040804.GJ52011508@sgi.com> |
| References: | <46B91EBA.10407@sandeen.net> <20070808025615.GH52011508@sgi.com> <46B9316A.40508@sandeen.net> <20070808040804.GJ52011508@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 02:08:04PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > yeah, figured it had something to do w/ the ia64 weenies when I saw the > > 32 vs. 8, factor of 4 ... fine, fine, my bad. :) > > No, not your bad. Mine if anyones because I wrote the test. Ia64 supports 4k, 8k, 16k and 64k base pagesize. Time to add a little script to make the pagesize random for your kernel builds? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS thread inflation in 2.6.23rc, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Impact of atime updates on XFS, Martin Steigerwald |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |