xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on softw

To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:12:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: a1426z@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1IFb5f-00006O-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707302207.02672.a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> <E1IFb5f-00006O-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

Extrapolating these %cpu number makes ZFS the fastest.

Are you sure these numbers are correct?

Note, that %cpu numbers for fuse filesystems are inherently skewed,
because the CPU usage of the filesystem process itself is not taken
into account.

So the numbers are not all that good, but according to the zfs-fuse
author it hasn't been optimized yet, so they may improve.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


This was performed on an E6300, 1 core was ZFS/FUSE (or quite a bit of it anyway)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>