| To: | a1426z@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5 |
| From: | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:39:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200707302207.02672.a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> (message from Al Boldi on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:07:02 +0300) |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707302207.02672.a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> Extrapolating these %cpu number makes ZFS the fastest. > > Are you sure these numbers are correct? Note, that %cpu numbers for fuse filesystems are inherently skewed, because the CPU usage of the filesystem process itself is not taken into account. So the numbers are not all that good, but according to the zfs-fuse author it hasn't been optimized yet, so they may improve. Miklos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Al Boldi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Dave Kleikamp |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Al Boldi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Justin Piszcz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |