xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents

To: Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents
From: Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:26:04 +0000
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <op.tv9flnkx3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <op.tv9flnkx3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:18 +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:
> @@ -76,9 +77,10 @@ metadump_help(void)
>  " The 'metadump' command dumps the known metadata to a compact file
> suitable\n"
>  " for compressing and sending to an XFS maintainer for corruption
> analysis \n"
>  " or xfs_repair failures.\n\n"
> -" There are 3 options:\n"
> +" Options:\n"
>  "   -e -- Ignore read errors and keep going\n"
>  "   -g -- Display dump progress\n"
> +"   -m -- Specify max extent size limit to copy for metadata (default
> = 100)\n"

maybe "max extent size (blocks)" and "default = 100 blocks"?
-- 
Stewart Smith (stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
http://www.flamingspork.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>