| To: | "Stewart Smith" <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents |
| From: | "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:35:02 +1000 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1185780364.20232.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <op.tv9flnkx3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1185780364.20232.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32) |
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:26:04 +1000, Stewart Smith
<stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:18 +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:@@ -76,9 +77,10 @@ metadump_help(void) " The 'metadump' command dumps the known metadata to a compact file suitable\n" " for compressing and sending to an XFS maintainer for corruption analysis \n" " or xfs_repair failures.\n\n" -" There are 3 options:\n" +" Options:\n" " -e -- Ignore read errors and keep going\n" " -g -- Display dump progress\n" +" -m -- Specify max extent size limit to copy for metadata (default = 100)\n"maybe "max extent size (blocks)" and "default = 100 blocks"? " -m -- Specify max extent size in blocks to copy (default = 100 blocks)\n" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Review: demand reaping of filestreams objects, David Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents, Stewart Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents, Stewart Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, richid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |