xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents

To: "Stewart Smith" <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: REVIEW: Make xfs_metadump more robust against bad extents
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:35:02 +1000
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1185780364.20232.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SGI
References: <op.tv9flnkx3jf8g2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1185780364.20232.184.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32)
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:26:04 +1000, Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 14:18 +1000, Barry Naujok wrote:
@@ -76,9 +77,10 @@ metadump_help(void)
 " The 'metadump' command dumps the known metadata to a compact file
suitable\n"
 " for compressing and sending to an XFS maintainer for corruption
analysis \n"
 " or xfs_repair failures.\n\n"
-" There are 3 options:\n"
+" Options:\n"
 "   -e -- Ignore read errors and keep going\n"
 "   -g -- Display dump progress\n"
+"   -m -- Specify max extent size limit to copy for metadata (default
= 100)\n"

maybe "max extent size (blocks)" and "default = 100 blocks"?


" -m -- Specify max extent size in blocks to copy (default = 100 blocks)\n"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>