| To: | Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:01:05 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <5d96567b0707222309y61480271xa8220a0b179764e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5d96567b0707160542t2144c382mbfe3da92f0990694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070716130140.GC31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707160653m5951fac9v5a56bb4c92174d63@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070716221831.GE31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.1449.138328.66699@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717001205.GI31489@xxxxxxx> <18076.4940.845633.149160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070717005854.GL31489@xxxxxxx> <5d96567b0707222309y61480271xa8220a0b179764e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:09:03AM +0300, Raz wrote: > My QA to re-installed the system. same kernel, different results. now, > /proc/paritions > reports : > 9 1 5114281984 md1 > 9 2 5128001536 md2 > 9 3 10242281472 md3 > > blockdev --getsize64 /dev/md3 > 10488096227328 > > but xfs keeps on crashing. when formatting it ot 6.3 TB we're OK. when > letting xfs's mkfs choose the So at 6.3TB everything is ok. At what point does it start having problems? 6.4TB, 6.8TB, 8TB, 9TB? I know Neil pointed out that you shouldn't have 10TB but closer to 7TB - is this true? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS log warning "Writing back config space on device", amilrego |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: fix null files exposure growing via truncate V2, Lachlan McIlroy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Raz |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 958215 - xfs_bmap '-v' option isn't documented in the man page, Barry Naujok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |