xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2

from [Christoph Lameter] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:19:22 -0700
Cc: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Chinner" <dgc@xxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <BAY103-DAV5C915E9475BFB6180B585B2170@xxxxxxx>
Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc.
References: <BAY103-DAV717DD455F57B3BB064E3CB2100@xxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211121520.7711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY103-DAV5C915E9475BFB6180B585B2170@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:22:09 +0200
"Marco Berizzi" <pupilla@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With the same kernel or should I compile with
> some other options?

With the same kernel. No additional options are needed.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd), Christoph Lameter <=
Previous by Date:  [no subject], Moore Abel
Next by Date:  CLAIM, coordinatormanager
Previous by Thread:  [no subject], Moore Abel
Next by Thread:  Re: Review: fix null files exposure growing via truncate V2, Lachlan McIlroy
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]