xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms

To: James Braid <jamesb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New CentOS4/RHEL4-compatible xfs module rpms
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:58:30 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <73EF8A3A-4768-4717-88B4-57A2E00D4E02@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4560AB84.9060200@xxxxxxxxxxx> <48478.193.203.83.22.1184855825.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <469F8005.3080104@xxxxxxxxxxx> <73EF8A3A-4768-4717-88B4-57A2E00D4E02@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Macintosh/20070716)
James Braid wrote:
> On 19 Jul 2007, at 16:15, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> That's odd.  You have the module on the server, exporting an xfs
>> filesystem, and you're getting permission denied on the client?
> 
> Yep. And rmmod'ing the updated XFS module and insmod'ing the older  
> module makes it work again.

Interesting - what are the exact versions of "updated" and "older" that
you are using?  I'll look at the diff...

Thanks,
-Eric

> (yeah, in an ideal world we'd just run the latest kernel, but we're  
> stuck on RHEL4 for a bunch of reasons and XFS is so much better than  
> ext3 for our purposes, even with the old crufty version in the RHEL4  
> kernel)
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>