| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS repair on / in a hosted environment |
| From: | Rupa Schomaker <rupa@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Jul 2007 06:09:42 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070719023419.GC12413810@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <469E690B.5070600@xxxxxxxx> <20070719023419.GC12413810@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
On 7/18/2007 7:34 PM, David Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:24:59PM -0700, Rupa Schomaker wrote: >> I have a virtual server hosted in a XEN environment. Kernel is >> 2.6.16.13-XenU and I can't change it. :( Host provider is not responsive >> to getting us a newer kernel. >> >> Anyway, during my nightly rsync backup, I started seeing the following: > ..... > > what does /proc/mounts tell you (rather than /etc/mtab)? > > If /proc/mounts says ro, then try upgrading your xfsprogs package. > and then retrying the repair.... /proc/mounts shows ro. What version is new enough? I'm running debian sarge, so have: # xfs_repair -V xfs_repair version 2.9.0 ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/cmd_tars/ only shows a xfs_progs up to 2.8.21-1. > Cheers, > > Dave. Thanks, -Rupa |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 967580 - xfs_repair - fails on > 512 byte sector hardware, Barry Naujok |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tuning XFS for tiny files, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS repair on / in a hosted environment, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS repair on / in a hosted environment, Rupa Schomaker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |