| To: | timotheus <timotheus@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tuning XFS for tiny files |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:52:00 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m23azlbpl1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <m23azlbpl1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) |
timotheus wrote: > Hi. Is there a way to tune XFS filesystem parameters to better address > the usage pattern of 10000s of tiny files in directories such as: > maildir directory > mh mail directory > ccache directory > > My understanding is that XFS will always be much slower than reiserfs > with respect to deleting 10000s files; but that XFS might be possible to > tune toward more rapid read access of 10000s of tiny files. > > Regards, > -timotheus Do you have a way to benchmark your load? logv2 at mkfs time, and throwing in larger logbufs & logbsize as mount options might help. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Allocating inodes from a single block, Mike Montour |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Allocating inodes from a single block, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | tuning XFS for tiny files, timotheus |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tuning XFS for tiny files, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |