xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips

To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Advocacy] Re: 3ware 9650 tips
From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:38:09 -0400
Cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>, Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Collette <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ide-arrays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070716174801.GM13826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.LRH.0.999.0707131356520.25773@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.0.999.0707161142440.25773@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1184606132.4551.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707162040.00062.a1426z@xxxxxxxxx> <20070716174801.GM13826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 11:48 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Wow, thanks for bringing an advocacy thread onto linux-fsdevel.  Just what
> we wanted.  Do you have any insight into how to "get the data=ordered
> onto the VFS level"?  Because to me, that sounds like pure nonsense.

First off, I have no idea who decided to respond to my post and CC:
linux-fsdevel on it.

In retrospect, secondly, I should have not posted my post to linux-raid
in the first place (is that list now mirrored to linux-fsdevel or
something?).  I was just sharing in my frustration of the lack of XFS
support by Red Hat.

So, lastly and in any case, my apologies to all, even if I did not
proliferate it to linux-fsdevel, it was probably not ideal for me to
post such to anything on vger.kernel.org (like linux-raid) in the first
place.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith         Professional, Technical Annoyance
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx   http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------
        Fission Power:  An Inconvenient Solution


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>