On 7/16/07, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:42:28PM +0300, Raz wrote:
> Hello
> I found that using xfs over raid50, ( two raid5's 8 disks each and
> raid 0 over them ) crashes the file system when the file system is ~
> 9TB. crashing is easy: we simply create few hundred of files, then
> erase them in bulk. the same test passes in 6.4TB filesystems.
> this bug happens in 2.6.22 as well as 2.6.17.7.
> thank you .
>
> 4391322.839000] Filesystem "md3": XFS internal error
> xfs_alloc_read_agf at line 2176 of file fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller
> 0xc10d31ea
> [4391322.863000] <c10d36e9> xfs_alloc_read_agf+0x199/0x220
> <c10d31ea> xfs_alloc_fix_freelist+0x41a/0x4b0
Judging by the kernel addresses (<c10d36e9>) you're running
an i386 kernel right? Which means there's probably a wrapping
issue at 8TB somewhere in the code which has caused an AGF
header to be trashed somewhere lower down in the filesystem.
what does /proc/partitions say? I.e. does the kernel see
the whole 9TB of space?
What does xfs_repair tell you about the corruption? (assuming
it doesn't OOM, which is a good chance if you really are on
i386).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
Well you are right. /proc/partitions says:
....
8 241 488384001 sdp1
9 1 3404964864 md1
9 2 3418684416 md2
9 3 6823647232 md3
while xfs formats md3 as 9 TB.
If i am using LBD , what is the biggest size I can use on i386 ?
many thanks
raz
--
Raz
|