xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsqa 144 is failing now

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsqa 144 is failing now
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070712150431.GA3763@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070712150431.GA3763@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

I'm trying to fix up dmapi for the patch that uses filldir internally,
and 144 is the xfsqa test for this functionality.  It worked fine a
few weeks ago when I started that work but fails with plain TOT linux-xfs
now with errors like:


< report: get #0 had no errors.
< report: get #1 had no errors.
---
ERROR: get #0, expected mode 35034, but found 33188
ERROR: get #0, expected uid -756063452, but found 0
ERROR: get #0, expected gid 323693819, but found 0
ERROR: get #0, expected mtime -424339458, but found 1184248449
ERROR: get #0, expected ctime -862739105, but found 1184248449
ERROR: get #0, expected dtime -862739105, but found 1184248449
ERROR: get #0, expected size 1125898004553757, but found 29696
report: 1 tests correct for get #0.
ERROR: get #1, expected mode 34544, but found 33188
ERROR: get #1, expected uid -1407127963, but found 0
ERROR: get #1, expected gid 1043573623, but found 0
ERROR: get #1, expected mtime -1589334486, but found

does anyone have an idea what might be causing this?

The only recent changes to xfs_dm.c are the hole punching fixes which
seem rather unrelated.



Curious, what do you use that utilizes DMAPI?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>