On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:55:43AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > Given the current behaviour for posix_fallocate() in glibc, I think > that retaining the same error semantic and punting the cleanup to > userspace (where the app will fail with ENOSPC anyway) is the only > sane thing we can do here. Trying to undo this in the kernel leads > to lots of extra rarely used code in error handling paths... Agreed, looks like we should stay with the user has to clean up behaviour. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate, Amit K. Arora |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |