xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate

To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:31:07 +0100
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070703100848.GA14936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20070614120413.GD86004887@xxxxxxx> <20070614193347.GN5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625132810.GA1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625134500.GE1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625150320.GA8686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625214626.GJ5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626103247.GA19870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070630102111.GB23568@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070630165246.GA5159@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070703100848.GA14936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:38:48PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > FA_FL_DEALLOC               0x01 /* deallocate unwritten extent (default 
> > allocate) */
> > FA_FL_KEEP_SIZE     0x02 /* keep size for EOF {pre,de}alloc (default change 
> > size) */
> > FA_FL_DEL_DATA      0x04 /* delete existing data in alloc range (default 
> > keep) */
> 
> We now have two sets of flags - 
> 1) the above three with which I think no one has any issues with, and

Yes, I do.  FA_FL_DEL_DATA is plain stupid, a preallocation call should
never delete data.  FA_FL_DEALLOC should probably be a separate syscall
because it's very different functionality.

While we're at it I also dislike the FA_ prefix becuase it doesn't say
anything and is far too generic.  FALLOC_ is much better.

> > FA_FL_ERR_FREE      0x08 /* free preallocation on error (default keep 
> > prealloc) */

NACK on this one.  We should have just one behaviour, and from the thread
that not freeing the allocation on error.

> > FA_FL_NO_MTIME      0x10 /* keep same mtime (default change on size, data 
> > change) */
> > FA_FL_NO_CTIME      0x20 /* keep same ctime (default change on size, data 
> > change) */

NACK to these aswell.  If i_size changes c/mtime need updates, if the size
doesn't chamge they don't.  No need to add more flags for this.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>