xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume

To: David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:56:50 +0900
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, David Robinson <zxvdr.au@xxxxxxxxx>, LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LinuxRaid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H4rkDpUMOGG0f5cDwKjEEGNlD9v/fMo1y7ddITW1CDt9qQ9QD+IsBhCmrqDO9KfXMwlKFgWLvADBkNZfwFjcldKeVloOU10zw+TKEc8O9gjNA7o6VJTF+gODV+Dr0C27qdOxPB4VfH6SWHRUIVmWUFJAOCn4E+R+7dayE2stvNU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I8z+D4KKOX/EPCRjkyp3sNVXfaz0k+1N8z96T0QMslU3138IHnF+UFFuc+FLpc0l5SKdorSg9XE5cqckcRE8h3F0L8RhtdUkYYBCeuXGhqnLTHUxHmzIH744d/SayE2GxSiQxFlEkZorq8UPwTtTf2NMe0DVARGCfaW4Jwp3owQ=
In-reply-to: <4684C0DD.4080702@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <46744065.6060605@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4674645F.5000906@xxxxxxxxx> <46751D37.5020608@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4676390E.6010202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070618145007.GE85884050@xxxxxxx> <4676D97E.4000403@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4677A0C7.4000306@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4677A596.7090404@xxxxxxxxx> <4677E496.3080506@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4678DF56.1020903@xxxxxxxxx> <467ABE25.7060303@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4684C0DD.4080702@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)
David Greaves wrote:
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> It's really weird tho.  The PHY RDY status changed events are coming
>>> from the device which is NOT used while resuming
> 
> There is an obvious problem there though Tejun (the errors even when sda
> isn't involved in the OS boot) - can I start another thread about that
> issue/bug later? I need to reshuffle partitions so I'd rather get the
> hibernate working first and then go back to it if that's OK?

Yeah, sure.  The problem is that we don't know whether or how those two
are related.  It would be great if there's a way to verify memory image
read from hibernation is intact.  Rafael, any ideas?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>