| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5 |
| From: | Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:11:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@p34.internal.lan> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707301021090.12456@p34.internal.lan> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 10:29 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Overall JFS seems the fastest but reviewing the mailing list for JFS it > seems like there a lot of problems, especially when people who use JFS > 1 > year, their speed goes to 5 MiB/s over time and the defragfs tool has been > removed(?) from the source/Makefile and on Google it says not to use it > due to corruption. The defragfs tool was an unported holdover from OS/2, which is why it was removed. There never was a working Linux version. I have some ideas to improve jfs allocation to avoid fragmentation problems, but jfs isn't my full-time job anymore, so I can't promise anything. I'm not sure about the corruption claims. I'd like to hear some specifics on that. Anyway, for enterprise use, I couldn't recommend jfs, since there is no full-time maintainer. Thanks, Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Miklos Szeredi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Justin Piszcz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bonnie++ benchmarks for ext2,ext3,ext4,jfs,reiserfs,xfs,zfs on software raid 5, Theodore Tso |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS shrink (step 0), Ruben Porras |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |