xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

REVIEW: xfs_repair doesn't handle fsblock != dirblock sizes properly

from [Barry Naujok] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>
Subject: REVIEW: xfs_repair doesn't handle fsblock != dirblock sizes properly
From: "Barry Naujok" <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:08:36 +1000
Organization: SGI
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32) 
Part of the improved xfs_repair performance speedups, the
prefetch/dir block handling code made sure the I/Os are the
same size between phases. Unfortunately, the blocks are
too small - directories were broken up into fsblock sizes
instead of dirblock sizes.

The attached patch fixes this regression up.

Attachment: fix_big_dirblocks.patch
Description: Binary data

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • REVIEW: xfs_repair doesn't handle fsblock != dirblock sizes properly, Barry Naujok <=
Previous by Date:  Hello,, Anne Nanda Bates
Next by Date:  Re: RFC: log record CRC validation, David Chinner
Previous by Thread:  Hello,, Anne Nanda Bates
Next by Thread:  Properties., Peter Kok
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]