| To: | Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:24:32 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5d96567b0707160657x7b948026w89ef7c0241c41bf3@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <5d96567b0707160542t2144c382mbfe3da92f0990694@mail.gmail.com> <20070716130140.GC31489@sgi.com> <5d96567b0707160657x7b948026w89ef7c0241c41bf3@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) |
Raz wrote: > Well you are right. /proc/partitions says: > .... > 8 241 488384001 sdp1 > 9 1 3404964864 md1 > 9 2 3418684416 md2 > 9 3 6823647232 md3 > > while xfs formats md3 as 9 TB. > If i am using LBD , what is the biggest size I can use on i386 ? With LBD on, you *should* be able to get to 16TB (2^32 * 4096) in general, assuming that everything in your IO path is clean. (The 16TB limit is due to page cache addressing on x86). -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Raz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3ware 9650 tips, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, Raz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raid50 and 9TB volumes, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |