xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [-mm PATCH] ocfs2: ->fallocate() support

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] ocfs2: ->fallocate() support
From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:18:12 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amit Arora <aarora@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070630093413.GE22354@infradead.org>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20070621190143.GC17713@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20070630093413.GE22354@infradead.org>
Reply-to: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:34:13AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, it seems like ocfs implements the xfs preallocation ioctls.  What
> would people thing about moving those up to work over ->fallocate so they
> can be used on all filesystems that support preallocation?

That sounds like a good idea. We've already got a very good match on
RESVP/UNRESVP with the various ->fallocate flags.

I'm not sure whether we want to do this for ALLOCSP/FREESP - as far as I've
heard those are hardly used.


> While the ABI is quite ugly it has a huge userbase because it's the only
> existing preallocation mechanism on Linux.

Yeah, that was the primary reason I chose to implement the ioctl (along with
the ->fallocate patch)
        --Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [-mm PATCH] ocfs2: ->fallocate() support, Mark Fasheh <=