| To: | Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [-mm PATCH] ocfs2: ->fallocate() support |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:34:13 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amit Arora <aarora@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070621190143.GC17713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20070621190143.GC17713@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:01:43PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: > Plug ocfs2 into the ->fallocate() callback. We only support FA_ALLOCATE for > now - FA_DEALLOCATE will come later. Btw, it seems like ocfs implements the xfs preallocation ioctls. What would people thing about moving those up to work over ->fallocate so they can be used on all filesystems that support preallocation? While the ABI is quite ugly it has a huge userbase because it's the only existing preallocation mechanism on Linux. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/6][TAKE5] fallocate system call, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][XFS][resend] fix memory leak in xfs_inactive(), Jesper Juhl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |