| To: | "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 09:39:40 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070628181913.GC1674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <20070614091458.GH5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070614120413.GD86004887@xxxxxxx> <20070614193347.GN5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625132810.GA1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625134500.GE1951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625150320.GA8686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625214626.GJ5181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626103247.GA19870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626153413.GC6652@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070626231803.GQ31489@xxxxxxx> <20070628181913.GC1674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 23:49 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote: > > > Correct, but for swap files that's not an issue - no user should be > able > > too read them, and FA_MKSWAP would really need root privileges to > execute. > > Will the FA_MKSWAP mode still be required with your suggested change > of > teaching do_mpage_readpage() about unwritten extents being in place ? > Or, will you still like to have FA_MKSWAP mode ? There's no need for a MKSWAP flag. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: project quotas fstab, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate, Amit K. Arora |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/7][TAKE5] support new modes in fallocate, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |