| To: | Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SLUB Allocator? |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:31:16 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211241290.31303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211241290.31303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:42:03PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB > allocator? /me shrugs When it grows memory defrag of caches, yes. Otherwise I can't see there being any noticable difference. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | sunit-swidth parameters, Richard Scobie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] remove hard-coded fnames from tracing functions, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | SLUB Allocator?, Justin Piszcz |
| Next by Thread: | Wrong Data Pointer-XFS File system, Sandy1 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |