| To: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr allocation group optimization |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:24:39 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Johan Andersson <johan@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <46723DC4.1080107@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <1181544692.19145.44.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070612014452.GK86004887@xxxxxxx> <46723DC4.1080107@xxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 17:20 +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > > I don't know about a "long way" (longer to fully supported, yes) > Firstly, I need to move its hooks out of linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c which > were > referring to xfs inodes (instead of vnodes) probably back where they > were in > xfs_vnodeops.c. > > Nathan, did you have some other suggestion than this - unfortunately, > I haven't looked at this code (until recently) for a while. Geez, that takes me back - hummm, I seem to remember a possibly-iget- related performance issue? Not much else, sorry (it _is_ beer o'clock on a Friday arvo after all...). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_fsr allocation group optimization, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Review: fix test 004 to account for reserved space, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr allocation group optimization, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr allocation group optimization, Johan Andersson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |