| To: | salmr0@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sunit not working |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:28:17 +1000 |
| Cc: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, "Salmon, Rene" <Rene.Salmon@xxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <902286657-1181653953-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1527539029-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1181608444.3758.73.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <902286657-1181653953-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1527539029-@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:12:15PM +0000, salmr0@xxxxxx wrote: > > Thanks that helps. Now that I know I have the right sunit and swidth I have > a performace related question. > > If I do a dd on the raw device or to the lun directy I get speeds of around > 190-200 MBytes/sec. > > As soon as I add xfs on top of the lun my speeds go to around 150 > MBytes/sec. This is for a single stream write using various block sizes on a > 2 Gbit/sec fiber channel card. That's for buffered I/O, right? That sounds about right - if you do two writes, it should increase a little further. Also, direct I/O should be able to get you to >90% of the raw device capability.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: sunit not working, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.21.3 Oops (was Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd), Satyam Sharma |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sunit not working, David Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [GIT PULL] xfs maintainers file update, Timothy Shimmin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |