| To: | Just Marc <marc@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks |
| From: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:58:46 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nscott@xxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4684C168.2050605@corky.net> |
| References: | <4683ADF5.9050901@corky.net> <1183075929.15488.148.camel@edge.yarra.acx> <4684A728.1050405@corky.net> <20070629081357.GC14519@one.firstfloor.org> <4684C168.2050605@corky.net> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:23:04AM +0100, Just Marc wrote: > You might have hit the > nail on the head, some of the files it was not able to improve are on > filesystems that are almost full. Don't do that then. It's probably the reason you get the bad fragmentation in the first place. Most file systems perform very poorly when they are nearly full. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [GIT PULL] XFS lockdep fix for 2.6.22, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Next by Thread: | xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |