| To: | Just Marc <marc@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:33:55 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Barry Naujok <bnaujok@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4684B1CC.60004@corky.net> |
| Organization: | Aconex |
| References: | <4683ADEB.3010106@corky.net> <46841C60.5030207@sandeen.net> <4684A506.4030705@corky.net> <op.tun7i8wd3jf8g2@pc-bnaujok.melbourne.sgi.com> <4684A98B.1030000@corky.net> <20070629070814.GR31489@sgi.com> <4684B1CC.60004@corky.net> |
| Reply-to: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 08:16 +0100, Just Marc wrote: > > > In my first post I already said something like that can be done but > it's > just an ugly hack. Don't you think it would best be handled cleanly > and correctly by fsr itself? > As I said earlier, fsr already issues the ioctl you're concerned about using - I'm not sure what the issue is there - if you need to do a setxattr, Just Do It. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume, David Greaves |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, Just Marc |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_fsr, performance related tweaks, David Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |