xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to?

To: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to?
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 20:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0706030115410.16496@sheep.housecafe.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706021723480.22318@p34.internal.lan> <4661F511.4070207@goop.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706021855260.3376@p34.internal.lan> <alpine.DEB.0.99.0706030115410.16496@sheep.housecafe.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx


On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote:

On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
XFS currently has a data-corrupting bug, where files which were appended
by small amounts may lose their updates on umount - I see this
corrupting hg repos. There's a patch which works for me, and is in
2.6.22-rc3-mm1, but it hasn't been merged upstream yet.

Just for the record, you mean this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/12/93 ..right? (haven't been bitten by this one...yet)


Ah that's it- and USB appears to be broken as well, I'll stick with 2.6.21.3 for now.

Got any pointers? I'm using USB right now, one is i386 with 2.6.22-rc3, another one is powerpc, tracking -git and USB seems to work.


C.
--
BOFH excuse #15:

temporary routing anomaly


Sent this in another e-mail to LKML, it breaks support for my UPS:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>