xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 1/3] Fix XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V1 in compat mode

To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] Fix XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY_V1 in compat mode
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 23:48:53 +0200
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070530170530.GA4197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070530125954.706423971@xxxxxxx> <20070530143043.216024061@xxxxxxx> <20070530170530.GA4197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6
On Wednesday 30 May 2007, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> 
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:59:55PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> 
> > +typedef struct xfs_fsop_geom_v132 {
> 
> wouldn't xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32
>                          ^
> 
> > +     __u32           blocksize;      /* filesystem (data) block size */
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +     __u32           dirblocksize;   /* directory block size, bytes  */
> > +} __attribute__((packed)) xfs_fsop_geom_v132_t;
> 
> and xfs_fsop_geom_v1_32_t
>                     ^
> 
> read better there?

Actually, the current convention would be struct compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1
and compat_xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t.

        Arnd <><


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>