xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RESVSP problems

To: Å?ukasz Fibinger <lucke@xxxxx>
Subject: Re: RESVSP problems
From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 21:24:41 +1000
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200705251224.23624.lucke@xxxxx>
References: <200705241324.53283.lucke@xxxxx> <20070525050632.GG86004887@xxxxxxx> <200705251224.23624.lucke@xxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Å?ukasz Fibinger wrote:
> On Friday 25 of May 2007, you wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Å?ukasz Fibinger wrote:
> > > >>> You've probably hit:
> > > >>> http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=418
> > > >>> unwritten extents remain unwritten after mmap() modifies them
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Bug dchinner about it... ;-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Dave, consider it a bugging from my humble self :-)
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, yeah ;)
> > > >
> > > > I'm waiting to see what happens with Nick's patches in .22 before
> > > > going any further. If they are not merged into .22, then I think we
> > > > should push the XFS specific fix in....
> > >
> > > I wonder, what's the status of it, Dave?
> >
> > A couple of days ago:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=117988295814519&w=2
> >
> 
> I see. If that's the case, would sharing your 2.6.21 XFS specific fixes (you 
> have them, right?) with me be any problem for you?

The original XFS specific code was here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117080251026985&w=2

But if you want to patch your own kernel, I suggest that
you use the latest generic version I posted here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117426058311029&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117426070111133&w=2

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>