| To: | Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams |
| From: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2007 10:05:23 +1000 |
| Cc: | David Chatterton <dchatterton@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'xfs-dev'" <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, "'xfs-oss'" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David Chinner'" <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20070514223946.GA19487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <000001c79544$44076ac0$0501010a@DCHATTERTONLAPTOP> <20070514223946.GA19487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:39:46AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > So yes this is designed for a workload where the number of AGs is a multiple > > of the number of streams since mixing streams in the one AG is the problem > > it tries to avoid. > > Sounds like a awful special case. Is that common? Common enough to be a serious problem when running multiple 2k ingest and playout streams (320MB/s each). Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5][TAKE2] fallocate() implementation on i86, x86_64 and powerpc, Stephen Rothwell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams, David Chatterton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |