| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 May 2007 23:49:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070504234357.24d22883@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20070503164521.16efe075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504073344.GL32602149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504152546.614374ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200705041758.21320.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504234357.24d22883@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) |
Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:58:21 +0200 vous écriviez:Did you test with ext3 as well? You wrote it crashes with ReiserFS (version 3) even faster. When it crashes with several filesystems its unlikely to be a filesystem issue.Unfortunately ext3 doesn't support volumes bigger than 8TB, so that's useless to me. I plan to test jfs, however. I think it's more a dm/md issue, but I'm not sure... Most recent kernels (2.6.19 or so IIRC) & cvs e2fsprogs (or that from rhel5/centos5) can do up to 16T ext3 filesystems, so you should be able to test that if you like. -Eric |
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mail System Error - Returned Mail, Auto-reply from pjmarkert@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Emmanuel Florac |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |