| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 May 2007 17:30:49 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <463B4962.70904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <20070503164521.16efe075@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504005922.GC32602149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504090613.7c0f97d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504073344.GL32602149@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070504152546.614374ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <463B4962.70904@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Le Fri, 04 May 2007 09:55:30 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > Emmanuel Florac wrote: > > Le Fri, 4 May 2007 17:33:44 +1000 > > David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> écrivait: > > > >> Well, there's your problem. Stack overflows. IMO, if you use a > >> filesystem, you shouldn't use 4k stacks. ;) > >> > >> If you remake you kernel with 8k stacks then your problems will > >> most likely go away. > > > > Well, I've double-checked the asm-i386/module.h, and it actually > > looks like 4K stacks is NOT the default, so I must be using 8K, > > isn't it? > > Depends on how you config'd it, just look at the .config you built > with, and search for CONFIG_4KSTACKS config-2.6.17.13: # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set So the problem lies elsewhere... -- ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ---------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Martin Steigerwald |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS crash on linux raid, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |