xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem

To: Pallai Roland <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: raid5: I lost a XFS file system due to a minor IDE cable problem
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Linux-Raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200705241318.30711.dap@mail.index.hu>
References: <200705241318.30711.dap@mail.index.hu>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Including XFS mailing list on this one.

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Pallai Roland wrote:


Hi,

I wondering why the md raid5 does accept writes after 2 disks failed. I've an
array built from 7 drives, filesystem is XFS. Yesterday, an IDE cable failed
(my friend kicked it off from the box on the floor:) and 2 disks have been
kicked but my download (yafc) not stopped, it tried and could write the file
system for whole night!
Now I changed the cable, tried to reassembly the array (mdadm -f --run),
event counter increased from 4908158 up to 4929612 on the failed disks, but I
cannot mount the file system and the 'xfs_repair -n' shows lot of errors
there. This is expainable by the partially successed writes. Ext3 and JFS
has "error=" mount option to switch filesystem read-only on any error, but
XFS hasn't: why? It's a good question too, but I think the md layer could
save dumb filesystems like XFS if denies writes after 2 disks are failed, and
I cannot see a good reason why it's not behave this way.

Do you have better idea how can I avoid such filesystem corruptions in the
future? No, I don't want to use ext3 on this box. :)


my mount error: XFS: Log inconsistent (didn't find previous header) XFS: failed to find log head XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5 XFS: log mount failed


-- d

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>