xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams

To: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Review: Concurrent Multi-File Data Streams
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:08:56 -0500
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, xfs-dev <xfs-dev@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
References: <20070511003606.GB85884050@sgi.com> <p73sla1ev7o.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326)
Andi Kleen wrote:

Also centisecs is a really ugly unit whose use should be probably not 
propagated.

-Andi

Hmm at one point I thought the preferred unit for this sort of tuneable *was* centisecs. What's the unit du jour?


[root@neon ~]# sysctl -a  |grep cent
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 2999
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 499
fs.xfs.age_buffer_centisecs = 1500
fs.xfs.xfsbufd_centisecs = 100
fs.xfs.xfssyncd_centisecs = 3000

I think xfs was following the vm lead at one point.

-Eric


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>