xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question

To: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS on x86_64 Linux Question
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:09:53 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5d96567b0704280457t464e5c3fm81a9e22a5608751@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704280633510.7998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704280636220.7998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d96567b0704280457t464e5c3fm81a9e22a5608751@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Wow, probably better to stick with 32bit then?

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote:

Justin hello
I have tested 32 to 64 bit porting of linux raid5 and xfs and LVM
it worked. though i cannot say I have tested throughly. it was a POC.

On 4/28/07, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With correct CC'd address.


On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:

> Hello--
>
> Had a quick question, if I re-provision a host with an Intel Core Duo CPU
> with x86_64 Linux; I create a software raid array and use the XFS
> filesystem-- all in 64bit space...
>
> If I boot a recovery image such as Knoppix, it will not be able to work on
> the filesystem correct?  I would need a 64bit live CD?
>
> Does the same apply to software raid? Can I mount a software raid created in
> a 64bit environment in a 32bit environment?
>
> Justin.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
Raz



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>