| To: | Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:13:38 -0500 |
| Cc: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <9a8748490704260317u211c244au3c5478ac02c12c43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200704251116.57737.jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> <20070425233345.GN48531920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9a8748490704260317u211c244au3c5478ac02c12c43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) |
Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 26/04/07, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Known false positive - XFS doesn't have the annotations needed for >> this yet; we've got a patch that will probably make it's way into 6.5.22 that >> should fix most of these issues. wow... 6.5.22.... do we really have to wait that long? :) -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS, Jesper Juhl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 0/5] fallocate system call, Amit K. Arora |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS, Jesper Juhl |
| Next by Thread: | Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000, Martin Eisenhardt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |