Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors.

xfs

Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors.

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors.
From:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 7 Apr 2007 22:47:37 +0200
In-reply-to:	<A63C579E7F04E74588517328EF5A385E02076A9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<A63C579E7F04E74588517328EF5A385E02076A9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20070405_112347_743716_6E82B98E) (sfid-20070405_112347_743716_6E82B98E) (sfid-20070405_112347_743716_6E82B98E)
Sender:	xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.9.6

Am Donnerstag 05 April 2007 schrieb Zak, Semion:
> Hi,
>
> We are studying possibility to use XFS with cheap (not too reliable)
> discs, so we have some questions:

Hi Semion!

I recommend at least monitoring the health status of the drives using 
smartmontools - with regular short and long selft test - or a similar 
mechanism. So you *may* at least be warned *before* a disk fails.

Otherwise I would go for a redundant RAID array at least so that at least 
one drive in a bunch of drives can fail without data loss.

Regards,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Zak, Semion Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Eric Sandeen RE: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Zak, Semion Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Peter Grandi Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Martin Steigerwald <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Strange delete performance using XFS, Peter Grandi
Next by Date:	Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Paul Mackerras
Previous by Thread:	Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Peter Grandi
Next by Thread:	Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Amit K. Arora
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]