| To: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS Resiliency to the disk errors. |
| From: | "Zak, Semion" <SZak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Apr 2007 11:08:07 +0300 |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | Acd3WYs9KYsrse46SLGHxEpphOjGKg== |
| Thread-topic: | XFS Resiliency to the disk errors. |
Hi, We are studying possibility to use XFS with cheap (not too reliable) discs, so we have some questions: What in XFS is done to survive the disk errors (bad sectors)? I know about superblock duplication in every AG. What else? What is XFS behavior in case of the disk errors (panic/no mount/partial data access)? What could be done to restore? If zero bad sector/dump to other device/format/restore will help? Thanks, Semion. [[HTML alternate version deleted]] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Strange delete performance using XFS, Thomas Kaehn |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Strange delete performance using XFS, Thomas Kaehn |
| Previous by Thread: | xfs_repair leaves empty but undeletable dirs in lost+found, Lars Ellenberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Resiliency to the disk errors., Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |