Am Montag 26 März 2007 schrieb David Chinner:
> > Is there some mount flag to say "cope without barriers" or "require
> > barriers" ??
> XFs has "-o nobarrier" to say don't use barriers, and this is
> *not* the default. If barriers don't work, we drop back to "-o
> nobarrier" after leaving a loud warning inthe log....
Just a thought, maybe it shouldn't do that automatically, but require the
sysadmin to explicitely state "-o nobarrier" in that case. Safest default
behavior IMHO would be either not to mount at all without "-o nobarrier"
if the device has no barrier support or disable the write cache of that
device. The latter can be considered a layering violation in itself.
BTW XFS copes really well here with commodity hardware such as my
ThinkPads with 2.5 inch notebook harddisks *since* 126.96.36.199.
But right now I wondered about barrier support on USB connected devices? I
have to check whether XFS does barriers on those. Does the usb mass
storage driver support barriers?
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7