| To: | "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call |
| From: | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:33:50 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, suparna@xxxxxxxxxx, cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20070316143101.GA10152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20070117094658.GA17390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070225022326.137b4875.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070301183445.GA7911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070316143101.GA10152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:01:01 +0530 "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len); > > --- linux-2.6.20.1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h > +++ linux-2.6.20.1/include/asm-powerpc/systbl.h > @@ -305,3 +305,4 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(faccessat) > COMPAT_SYS_SPU(get_robust_list) > COMPAT_SYS_SPU(set_robust_list) > COMPAT_SYS(move_pages) > +SYSCALL(fallocate) It is going to need to be a COMPAT_SYS call in powerpc because 32 bit powerpc will pass the two loff_t's in pairs of registers while 64bit passes them in one register each. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] get rid of fname[] for tracing functions, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call, Paul Mackerras |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call, Paul Mackerras |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call, Amit K. Arora |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |