xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Questions about XFS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Questions about XFS
From: Jason White <jasonjgw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:47:31 +1100
In-reply-to: <200703161136.32234.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200703131440.56678.clflush@xxxxxxxxx> <45F8CAEA.3050408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200703151007.32630.clflush@xxxxxxxxx> <200703161136.32234.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:36:31AM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
 
> Since 2.6.17.7 and enabled write barriers I didn't loose meta data 
> consistency on my laptop anymore and I can tell you that it crashed a lot 
> due to my experiments with what not (especially OSS radeon drivers and 
> beryl;-). I also had some classical power outages. 

My laptop also supports write barriers, but I leave the battery in place in
case there's a power outage; effectively it's operating as a UPS.

This might be slightly off-topic, but in choosing a SATA drive for a desktop
machine, what features/standard-complaince should one look for in order to
ensure that write barriers work? I know this involves flushing the drive
cache, but is this support mandatory in any of the applicable standards?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>