Re: Should xfs_repair take this long?

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:15:03AM -0400, Thomas Walker wrote:
> >    No problem.  The error was with the iflag=direct, apparently RHEL4 
> > doesn't like that option so I took it out.  Here's the output from each 
> > of the xfs volumes;
> > [root@hla-ags ~]# dd if=/dev/mapper/vg0-hladata3 bs=512 count=1 | od -Ax -x
> > 1+0 records in
> > 1+0 records out
> > 000000 0000 6419 0000 0c00 0000 7419 0000 0c00
> > 000010 0000 8419 0000 0c00 0000 9419 0000 0c00
> That's not a XFS superblock :(
lmdd pattern?

> > [root@hla-ags ~]# dd if=/dev/mapper/vg1-hladata2 bs=512 count=1 | od -Ax -x
> > 1+0 records in
> > 000000 7970 6f72 746f 203a 2030 0a2f 500a 414c
> > 000010 4e49 4b0a 3120 410a 560a 3120 0a34 6964
> > 000020 2072 2e31 2e30 3572 392f 3830 4b0a 3420
> > 000030 690a 746f 0a61 2056 3531 660a 6c69 2065
> Neither is that - it's a bunch of text that doesn't
> make much sense to me....
[esandeen@neon ~]$ echo "pyroot" | hexdump
0000000 7970 6f72 746f 000a

python?

*shrug*